「遇到TSE後,我放下了蔡頭」﹣風景銘鏡交替淺談


使用ZEISS 21/2.8+5D2這組合不經不覺已經有一年。   

Casa Milà.


對於ZE,其實我半點怨言也沒有,它的確是135全幅鏡頭中數一數二的鏡皇,無論是變形,銳利度,邊角成象,抗耀都是我用過的廣角鏡中最強的。 「把風景照都交給它就可以了」

3D雲.
  
  蔡司T*的立體感。

あの夏の白い雲.

  很艷但又不會令人反感的發色。

Peace.
  
  一流的細節。

Lloyd's of London.
  
  控制得十分好的超廣角變形和超強的銳度。 既然ZE21已經這麼貼近完美,為何現在又要把它放下? Flickr上有一位叫Spiraldelight的夜景高手,他所拍的照片有一種特別的透視感和現代感。

Swirly deLights
  
  除了更複雜的後製技術外,要拍到這種風格的照片還需要有移軸鏡頭。 購買TSE17的想法就是在那時候萌生了。 想了半年,最後在從英國放暑假回國的七月正式入手。

City of Life.
  
  跟Spiraldelight比起來,還差太遠了。

MK.
  
 移軸鏡的使用方法看似複雜,其實實際上沒有想像中的難。 只要把LIVE VIEW打開,上下轉一下就好了,在白天都一樣可以手持,雖然說不上方便,不過也不太麻煩。

Way home.
  
  Tilt的效果在17MM這焦距上並不明顯所以我基本上是直接把這功能無視掉的。

Sky No.1 - Guangzhou.
   
對我來說移軸鏡的價值在於Shift身上,那有別於一般超廣角鏡頭的視覺實在令人著迷。

日落以前.
  
  除了多了移軸功能外TSE17也比ZE21要廣一點,4mm的差別在超廣角鏡頭上是很明顯的。

Kwun Tong.
  
  我對ZE21唯一的不滿是它不夠廣,和C16-35, N12-24, TSE17等鏡頭比起來,在拍大景時總會少了點氣勢。 可是和ZE21比起來,TSE17只有F4的光圈。不錯,用超廣角鏡頭時我們都很少把光圈開到最大,但在室內不能使用腳架的時候大一級的光圈便變得十分實用了。同時F2.8也算是拍攝銀河(不是星軌)的最低門檻,只有F4的話ISO便要推得很高,雜訊會變得明顯,同時亦影響畫質。

La Seu Cathedral.

   ZE21在這樣的低光環境下表現更理想。

你在這裡.
  
  去年用ZE21光圈全開在合歡山上拍的星星

My first milky way shot!!!
  
  如果那時用TSE17的話,畫質便會差一點了。

365.3 明日晴れるかな.
  
  另外TSE也因為光圈較小,像上圖(ZE拍的)那樣的廣角淺景深效果也會比ZE21遜一點。

365.125 Palm.
  
  ZE21的散景實在教人留戀。

365.249 Brand New Wings.
  
  當然像這樣全開光圈+Shift也可以有別樹一格的效果。

HKIFC.
  
  至於在銳利度方面,我認為兩者並沒有太大的分野。邊角成象方面的話ZE21是明顯比較優的,在立體感和發色方面,個人主觀感覺還是蔡頭比較討好。 所謂「一山不能藏二虎」,考慮到口袋和負重,我知道選擇了TSE的我現在的確需要把ZE給出掉。

365.73 Carl Zeiss Incinerator.
  
  ZE的確是一顆銘鏡,135的廣角神, 這是我第一次懷著這樣不捨的感覺去賣鏡頭。

My way.
  
  謝謝你跟我走過這一年。 21蔡頭,我知道我們總會再相遇的,以ZM的形式。

7 則留言:

  1. 耶~ 哥哥有專屬的網頁了 *0*

    回覆刪除
  2. 照片真的都很棒
    看到這樣的照片沒錢買蔡司跟移軸鏡真的很扼腕

    另外敝人想問個笨問題
    鏡頭的發色跟風格檔會有關係嗎?

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 其實其他鏡頭也沒有很差拉~

      更風格和後製都有關喔。

      刪除
  3. Thanks for the great review! What do you think of the 24L II? I am looking for a wide-er lens (widest I have right now is a 35mm haha) and I cant seem to really decide between 24L and ZE21!

    From researching online it seems the ZE has a better image quality, but the fact that 24L has auto focus and f1.4 makes the decision much harder.

    I would love to hear what you think :)

    Thanks!
    Dave

    PS: Sorry I cant type Chinese on this computer but I can read your blog just fine. Great blog!

    回覆刪除
  4. Hi Dave,

    It really depends on what you want to do with the lens. Apparently the f1.4 on the 24L is extremely useful in low-light condition and it's also perfect for milkway shots as well. However, as far as i know, the image quality when shooting wide open is pretty bad. If u are not desperate for large aperture, I think the ZE21 will be a better choice. To me, lack of autofocusing seems not to be a big issue at all for a wide angle lens. Hope it helps :)

    Wilson

    回覆刪除
  5. Hey Wilson,

    It was almost a year ago since my last comment. I really appreciate your helpful reviews and comments. In the end I did not purchase either the 24L nor the ZE21. Instead I got the Sigma 35 1.4 and the Samyang 14 2.8 (!).

    I absolutely love love the Sigma 35. The Samyang 14 was silly wide and at that price (just a bit over $2k HKD) I couldn't resist.... It's super fun but the quality... haha... You get what you pay for...

    I'd still want to get either the 24L or the ZE21 sometime down the line though! And possibly a longer lens, like a 135L or 70-200 2.8 nonIS.

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts man, and I admire your photos greatly. I also traveled to Nepal earlier this year and if you have some time I would love to hear what you think of my shots: http://daveseephotos.com/blog/2013106/nepal-annapurna-trek

    Cheers,
    Dave

    回覆刪除